Open Access

Open Access publishing facilitates the perpetual dissemination of scientific knowledge via digital platforms, transcending the confines of Internet accessibility. This paradigm empowers scientists globally to freely exchange information and collaborate, thereby fostering the advancement of science. Our dedication lies in collaborating with the international academic community to advocate for open scholarly research worldwide.

Publication Ethics

The publication of scholarly articles in peer-reviewed journals constitutes a cornerstone in the establishment of a coherent and esteemed knowledge network. It serves as a reflection of both the authors' work quality and the publishers' standards.

Science Frontier adheres rigorously to the publication principles outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Editors bear responsibility for all content published within their respective journals. Editorial decisions regarding manuscript acceptance or rejection hinge upon criteria such as the paper's significance, originality, clarity, as well as the validity and pertinence of the study to the journal's scope. We expect our authors to uphold the highest standards of publication ethics.

Plagiarism Check

Science Frontier maintains a zero-tolerance policy towards any form of plagiarism in submitted articles. We actively encourage the submission of original, innovative work that enriches our publication. Our commitment lies in sourcing contributions from scholars known for their integrity and ability to produce unique content.

Review Process

Scholarly peer review in scientific journals stands as a pivotal quality assurance mechanism, wherein an author's academic endeavors undergo critical evaluation by experts in the relevant field before publication.

Only articles endorsed by highly qualified researchers possessing expertise pertinent to the subject matter are published by Science Frontier.

All journals under the purview of Science Frontier implement a rapid and thorough double-blind peer review system facilitated through electronic submission, allocation, and communication. Neither the author nor the reviewer identities are disclosed during this process. Submitted manuscripts undergo impartial screening to ascertain alignment with the journal's scope. The peer review process serves to ensure adherence to disciplinary standards.

Science Frontier initiates an initial editorial review process (pre-quality editorial assessment - PQA), wherein experts evaluate manuscripts for overall quality and suitability for publication. Following this assessment, manuscripts undergo a double-blinded peer review process, culminating in acceptance or rejection based on rigorous evaluation criteria.

img

Harry Brooks

journal of Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office.the reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding anu modifications for my manuscript,and the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help.it was my pleasure to contribute with your promising journal and i am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mark

My testimonial covering : the peer review process is qucick and effective,the support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly, quality of the Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports is scientific and publishers research.

img

Sinisa franjic

i would like to thank the editorial team for their timely responses and consideration in the publication of my paper . I would encourage to publish there research in ScienceFrontier.

img

Ritu Tiwari

I am pleased to submit my testimonials regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. As a peer reviewer for the manuscript titled “A Novel Dissolution Method for Simultaneous Estimation of sennoside A and Sennoside B in Senna Tablet,” I was consistently impressed by the reviewers’ thorough analysis, insightful feedback, and unwavering commitment to enhancing the quality of the work. Their reviews were comprehensive and characterized by a respectful and collaborative approach, providing valuable suggestions that significantly improved the paper's outcome. Their dedication to the peer review process demonstrated their expertise and steadfast pursuit of excellence.

img

Qader Bawerdi

With all due respect, I would like to express my opinion on the peer review, editorial support, and the quality of the journal as follows: The peer review was conducted quickly and with great care, and my article was accepted for publication in less than a week. The editorial support regarding the status of the article process was excellent, and they informed me every day until the acceptance of the current status of the article version, and regarding how to answer questions, the editorial support was excellent, timely, and friendly, and they answered questions as soon as possible and did not hesitate. The quality of the journal was excellent and it made me proud to be acquainted with the journal, and I sincerely look forward to extensive scientific collaborations in any field. I hope for increasing success and pride for the International Journal of Social Science Research and Review and all scientific and knowledge-based communities. Thank you

img

Bhuvanagiri Sathya Sindhuja

"I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the opportunity to contribute to this esteemed journal. The publication process was smooth, well-coordinated, and the peer reviewers deemed highly professional. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional diligence and support at every stage, ensuring a seamless experience from submission to final publication. I am truly honored to be featured in such a reputable platform and look forward to future collaborations."