Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15880574

Miswak or Toothbrush? Cultural Traditions and Oral Health Outcomes in Dental Patients from ibb City, Yemen

Safana Abdullah Algutaini 1*, Rasha Basheer Ali Mahyoub Abdo 2

MPH, PhD Student, Health Psychology, Walden University, USA.

2 Department of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen

Abstract

Background: Oral hygiene practices are deeply rooted in cultural, religious, and socioeconomic contexts. In Yemen, the use of the miswak—a traditional chewing stick—remains prevalent despite the global rise in modern dental care tools. This study compares the oral hygiene behaviors, perceptions, and outcomes among individuals who primarily use miswak versus those who use toothbrushes in Ibb City, Yemen.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 300 patients (150 miswak users and 150 toothbrush users) attending dental clinics in Ibb City. Participants completed structured questionnaires assessing demographics, cleaning behaviors, oral health perceptions, dental visit frequency, use of supplementary cleaning tools, and knowledge sources. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed to identify behavioral trends and health-related outcomes.

Results: Miswak users were more likely to reside in rural areas (39.3% vs. 32.7%) and cite religious leaders or family as their primary sources of hygiene knowledge. In contrast, toothbrush users more frequently report guidance from dentists or digital media. Toothbrush users were more likely to visit a dentist regularly (64% visited at least once a year vs. 44.7% of miswak users) and showed higher use of modern adjuncts such as dental floss and mouthwash. Miswak users perceived their cleaning method as more effective (63.3% vs. 34.0%) yet reported slightly higher rates of bad breath and gum bleeding. Use timing and technique varies significantly, with toothbrush users more likely to clean both morning and night and demonstrate consistent circular or vertical brushing motions.

Conclusions: The findings highlight distinct behavioral and cultural patterns between miswak and toothbrush users in Yemen. While miswak use remains tied to traditional knowledge and is perceived as effective by its users, there is a need for enhanced oral health education integrating both traditional practices and modern dental care strategies. Tailored public health campaigns—respectful of cultural norms—could help bridge gaps in awareness and preventive care utilization.

References

img

Harry Brooks

journal of Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office.the reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding anu modifications for my manuscript,and the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help.it was my pleasure to contribute with your promising journal and i am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mark

My testimonial covering : the peer review process is qucick and effective,the support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly, quality of the Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports is scientific and publishers research.

img

Sinisa franjic

i would like to thank the editorial team for their timely responses and consideration in the publication of my paper . I would encourage to publish there research in ScienceFrontier.

img

Ritu Tiwari

I am pleased to submit my testimonials regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. As a peer reviewer for the manuscript titled “A Novel Dissolution Method for Simultaneous Estimation of sennoside A and Sennoside B in Senna Tablet,” I was consistently impressed by the reviewers’ thorough analysis, insightful feedback, and unwavering commitment to enhancing the quality of the work. Their reviews were comprehensive and characterized by a respectful and collaborative approach, providing valuable suggestions that significantly improved the paper's outcome. Their dedication to the peer review process demonstrated their expertise and steadfast pursuit of excellence.

img

Qader Bawerdi

With all due respect, I would like to express my opinion on the peer review, editorial support, and the quality of the journal as follows: The peer review was conducted quickly and with great care, and my article was accepted for publication in less than a week. The editorial support regarding the status of the article process was excellent, and they informed me every day until the acceptance of the current status of the article version, and regarding how to answer questions, the editorial support was excellent, timely, and friendly, and they answered questions as soon as possible and did not hesitate. The quality of the journal was excellent and it made me proud to be acquainted with the journal, and I sincerely look forward to extensive scientific collaborations in any field. I hope for increasing success and pride for the International Journal of Social Science Research and Review and all scientific and knowledge-based communities. Thank you

img

Bhuvanagiri Sathya Sindhuja

"I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the opportunity to contribute to this esteemed journal. The publication process was smooth, well-coordinated, and the peer reviewers deemed highly professional. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional diligence and support at every stage, ensuring a seamless experience from submission to final publication. I am truly honored to be featured in such a reputable platform and look forward to future collaborations."

img

Safana Abdullah Algutaini

Testimonial for the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements It was a truly rewarding experience publishing our study, "Single-Surgeon Outcomes of Left Ventricular Aneurysm Repair in Wartime Syria: A 10-Year Retrospective Study at Damascus University Cardiac Surgery Hospital," with the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements. The editorial and peer-review process was both rigorous and efficient, demonstrating a high standard of academic integrity and scientific scrutiny. The journal’s commitment to open access and global health equity is evident in its support of research emerging from conflict-affected and resource-limited settings—making our work not only visible but impactful. The professionalism of the editorial team, the speed of communication, and the clarity of submission guidelines all contributed to a smooth publication process. We were particularly impressed by the quality of the publication layout and the prompt indexing of our article, which enhances its accessibility to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers worldwide. We are proud to have contributed to this journal and highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a reputable platform to disseminate clinically significant and globally relevant findings.