Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22796302

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis and Primary Polycythemia: Report of Two Cases

G. Khellaf 1,2*, A. Benziane1,2 1,2

¹University of Health Sciences Dr. Youcef El Khatib, Faculty of Medicine, Algiers, Algeria

²Department of Nephrology, Bab El Oued University Hospital, Algiers, Algeria

Abstract

Primary polycythemia, also known as polycythemia vera or Vaquez disease, is a myeloproliferative disorder characterized by excessive red blood cell production due to a mutation in the JAK2 protein, leading to uncontrolled proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells . Renal involvement in polycythemia vera is uncommon but can manifest as various glomerular diseases, including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) . We report two cases of patients with primary polycythemia and FSGS, highlighting the potential association between these two conditions and the importance of treating the underlying myeloproliferative disorder.

Case 1: A 19-year-old female patient, followed since the age of 15 years for primary FSGS diagnosed on renal biopsy performed for impure nephrotic syndrome with hematuria. Four years after complete remission, the patient presented with a relapse associated with polycythemia and thrombocytosis on complete blood count. Secondary causes of polycythemia were excluded. Bone marrow biopsy revealed findings consistent with polycythemia vera, despite negative JAK2 mutation testing. The hematology team proposed phlebotomy and myelosuppressive oral therapy. One month later, proteinuria regressed from 15 g/24h to 4.7 g/24h.

Case 2: A 45-year-old male patient, with a history of polycythemia vera diagnosed two years earlier, presented with nephrotic syndrome. Renal biopsy revealed focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The patient was treated with phlebotomy and myelosuppressive therapy, with improvement in proteinuria.

Discussion: The association between FSGS and polycythemia vera is rare but has been reported in the literature. The pathophysiology is thought to involve hyperviscosity, increased glomerular capillary pressure, and possible direct effects of JAK2 mutations on podocytes. Treatment of the underlying myeloproliferative disorder can lead to improvement of proteinuria, as observed in our patients.

Conclusion: Primary polycythemia should be considered in patients with FSGS and unexplained polycythemia. While polycythemia vera is not curable, early detection and appropriate treatment can reduce the risk of vascular complications and may improve renal outcomes.

References

img

Harry Brooks

journal of Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office.the reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding anu modifications for my manuscript,and the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help.it was my pleasure to contribute with your promising journal and i am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mark

My testimonial covering : the peer review process is qucick and effective,the support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly, quality of the Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports is scientific and publishers research.

img

Sinisa franjic

i would like to thank the editorial team for their timely responses and consideration in the publication of my paper . I would encourage to publish there research in ScienceFrontier.

img

Ritu Tiwari

I am pleased to submit my testimonials regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. As a peer reviewer for the manuscript titled “A Novel Dissolution Method for Simultaneous Estimation of sennoside A and Sennoside B in Senna Tablet,” I was consistently impressed by the reviewers’ thorough analysis, insightful feedback, and unwavering commitment to enhancing the quality of the work. Their reviews were comprehensive and characterized by a respectful and collaborative approach, providing valuable suggestions that significantly improved the paper's outcome. Their dedication to the peer review process demonstrated their expertise and steadfast pursuit of excellence.

img

Qader Bawerdi

With all due respect, I would like to express my opinion on the peer review, editorial support, and the quality of the journal as follows: The peer review was conducted quickly and with great care, and my article was accepted for publication in less than a week. The editorial support regarding the status of the article process was excellent, and they informed me every day until the acceptance of the current status of the article version, and regarding how to answer questions, the editorial support was excellent, timely, and friendly, and they answered questions as soon as possible and did not hesitate. The quality of the journal was excellent and it made me proud to be acquainted with the journal, and I sincerely look forward to extensive scientific collaborations in any field. I hope for increasing success and pride for the International Journal of Social Science Research and Review and all scientific and knowledge-based communities. Thank you

img

Bhuvanagiri Sathya Sindhuja

"I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the opportunity to contribute to this esteemed journal. The publication process was smooth, well-coordinated, and the peer reviewers deemed highly professional. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional diligence and support at every stage, ensuring a seamless experience from submission to final publication. I am truly honored to be featured in such a reputable platform and look forward to future collaborations."

img

Safana Abdullah Algutaini

Testimonial for the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements It was a truly rewarding experience publishing our study, "Single-Surgeon Outcomes of Left Ventricular Aneurysm Repair in Wartime Syria: A 10-Year Retrospective Study at Damascus University Cardiac Surgery Hospital," with the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements. The editorial and peer-review process was both rigorous and efficient, demonstrating a high standard of academic integrity and scientific scrutiny. The journal’s commitment to open access and global health equity is evident in its support of research emerging from conflict-affected and resource-limited settings—making our work not only visible but impactful. The professionalism of the editorial team, the speed of communication, and the clarity of submission guidelines all contributed to a smooth publication process. We were particularly impressed by the quality of the publication layout and the prompt indexing of our article, which enhances its accessibility to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers worldwide. We are proud to have contributed to this journal and highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a reputable platform to disseminate clinically significant and globally relevant findings.

img

Sajjad Ur Rahman

It is a great pleasure and honour to write this testimonial for IJPHRE which published our article on TH for HIE in LMIC on Feb 16th, 2026 and a commentary article on the same subject on 31st January 2025. Going through the very fast, well supported and properly guided process of publication in IJPHRE was an exceptional experience. The submission was very quick; peer review was very professional and done within a reasonable and short time. The comments of the reviewers meaningfully helped to reshape the manuscript without changing the fundamental dataset and analysis. The editorial board was very helpful and supportive. The communication was clear and instant, almost on daily basis. The team of authors felt very proud of seeing its manuscript published in an international journal of very high quality and esteem in remarkably short time of almost 45 days. We highly recommend IJPHRE for publication of all kinds of original scientific research, review articles and clinical guidelines.

img

Dr Sabita Sinha

I had a very positive experience with Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. Emma Daniel was highly professional, supportive, and responsive throughout the editorial process. Communication was clear and timely at every stage of manuscript handling. The journal maintains a smooth review process and encourages quality academic publishing. I truly appreciate the efforts of Emma Daniel and the editorial team, and I would be glad to collaborate with the journal again in the future.