Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21919285

Explainable AI for Optimizing Prosthetic Control: Real-Time Adaptation to Neuromuscular Signals in Lower Limb Amputees

Soren Falkner *

Vienna University of Technology, Facultyof Computer Engineering, Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

Lower limb amputation severely impairs mobility, and current prosthetic devices ranging from passive mechanical limbs to microprocessor-controlled systems fail to provide intuitive, adaptive control that restores natural gait. A critical barrier is the inability of existing control systems to interpret and adapt to individual users' neuromuscular signals in real time, leading to high cognitive load, gait asymmetry, and elevated fall risk. This paper presents XAI-Prosthesis, an explainable artificial intelligence framework for real-time, adaptive prosthetic control that integrates surface electromyography (sEMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals from the residual limb to predict user intent and continuously optimize prosthetic joint (knee and ankle) trajectories. The framework comprises three core components: (1) a lightweight temporal convolutional network (TCN) with attention that extracts both transient (intent onset) and sustained (gait phase) features from 8-channel sEMG and 6-axis IMU data at 200 Hz; (2) a real-time adaptation module employing online Bayesian inference that updates model parameters every 100 ms based on error between predicted and actual prosthetic motion, accommodating neuromuscular fatigue, muscle activation pattern drift, and walking terrain changes (level ground, stairs, ramps, uneven terrain); and (3) an explainability layer using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and counterfactual explanations that provides users and clinicians with interpretable feedback on why specific control decisions were made, enhancing trust and enabling informed clinical tuning. We validate XAI-Prosthesis on a longitudinal dataset from 24 unilateral transtibial amputees (mean age 48.2 ± 12.4 years, 38% female) who used the system during 6 months of home and community ambulation (total 8,400 hours of walking data). The system achieves intent recognition accuracy of 95.7% for five locomotion modes (level walking, stair ascent/descent, ramp ascent/descent) with average decision latency of 48 ms substantially faster than existing myoelectric control systems (typically 150-250 ms). Real-time adaptation reduces prosthetic joint angle trajectory error from 3.8° to 1.2° RMS compared to non-adaptive baseline (68% reduction). Gait symmetry (symmetry index) improves from 0.21 to 0.09 (57% improvement), and user-reported prosthetic satisfaction (PQ-Score) increases from 58 to 84 out of 100. Explainability feedback enables clinicians to identify problematic neuromuscular patterns and adjust prosthetic parameters without removing the device. Key neuromuscular predictors of gait intent include: integrated EMG of gastrocnemius lateralis (35% predictive weight), co-contraction index of tibialis anterior and soleus (28%), and IMU-derived shank angular velocity (22%). The model runs on an embedded edge device (NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano, 10W) with inference latency of 12 ms per time step, supporting real-time control. This work establishes that explainable AI, combining deep learning with online adaptation and interpretability, can transform prosthetic control from rigid, user-dependent calibration to personalized, adaptive, and trustworthy human-machine collaboration.

References

img

Harry Brooks

journal of Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office.the reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding anu modifications for my manuscript,and the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help.it was my pleasure to contribute with your promising journal and i am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mark

My testimonial covering : the peer review process is qucick and effective,the support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly, quality of the Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports is scientific and publishers research.

img

Sinisa franjic

i would like to thank the editorial team for their timely responses and consideration in the publication of my paper . I would encourage to publish there research in ScienceFrontier.

img

Ritu Tiwari

I am pleased to submit my testimonials regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. As a peer reviewer for the manuscript titled “A Novel Dissolution Method for Simultaneous Estimation of sennoside A and Sennoside B in Senna Tablet,” I was consistently impressed by the reviewers’ thorough analysis, insightful feedback, and unwavering commitment to enhancing the quality of the work. Their reviews were comprehensive and characterized by a respectful and collaborative approach, providing valuable suggestions that significantly improved the paper's outcome. Their dedication to the peer review process demonstrated their expertise and steadfast pursuit of excellence.

img

Qader Bawerdi

With all due respect, I would like to express my opinion on the peer review, editorial support, and the quality of the journal as follows: The peer review was conducted quickly and with great care, and my article was accepted for publication in less than a week. The editorial support regarding the status of the article process was excellent, and they informed me every day until the acceptance of the current status of the article version, and regarding how to answer questions, the editorial support was excellent, timely, and friendly, and they answered questions as soon as possible and did not hesitate. The quality of the journal was excellent and it made me proud to be acquainted with the journal, and I sincerely look forward to extensive scientific collaborations in any field. I hope for increasing success and pride for the International Journal of Social Science Research and Review and all scientific and knowledge-based communities. Thank you

img

Bhuvanagiri Sathya Sindhuja

"I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the opportunity to contribute to this esteemed journal. The publication process was smooth, well-coordinated, and the peer reviewers deemed highly professional. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional diligence and support at every stage, ensuring a seamless experience from submission to final publication. I am truly honored to be featured in such a reputable platform and look forward to future collaborations."

img

Safana Abdullah Algutaini

Testimonial for the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements It was a truly rewarding experience publishing our study, "Single-Surgeon Outcomes of Left Ventricular Aneurysm Repair in Wartime Syria: A 10-Year Retrospective Study at Damascus University Cardiac Surgery Hospital," with the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements. The editorial and peer-review process was both rigorous and efficient, demonstrating a high standard of academic integrity and scientific scrutiny. The journal’s commitment to open access and global health equity is evident in its support of research emerging from conflict-affected and resource-limited settings—making our work not only visible but impactful. The professionalism of the editorial team, the speed of communication, and the clarity of submission guidelines all contributed to a smooth publication process. We were particularly impressed by the quality of the publication layout and the prompt indexing of our article, which enhances its accessibility to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers worldwide. We are proud to have contributed to this journal and highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a reputable platform to disseminate clinically significant and globally relevant findings.

img

Sajjad Ur Rahman

It is a great pleasure and honour to write this testimonial for IJPHRE which published our article on TH for HIE in LMIC on Feb 16th, 2026 and a commentary article on the same subject on 31st January 2025. Going through the very fast, well supported and properly guided process of publication in IJPHRE was an exceptional experience. The submission was very quick; peer review was very professional and done within a reasonable and short time. The comments of the reviewers meaningfully helped to reshape the manuscript without changing the fundamental dataset and analysis. The editorial board was very helpful and supportive. The communication was clear and instant, almost on daily basis. The team of authors felt very proud of seeing its manuscript published in an international journal of very high quality and esteem in remarkably short time of almost 45 days. We highly recommend IJPHRE for publication of all kinds of original scientific research, review articles and clinical guidelines.

img

Dr Sabita Sinha

I had a very positive experience with Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. Emma Daniel was highly professional, supportive, and responsive throughout the editorial process. Communication was clear and timely at every stage of manuscript handling. The journal maintains a smooth review process and encourages quality academic publishing. I truly appreciate the efforts of Emma Daniel and the editorial team, and I would be glad to collaborate with the journal again in the future.