1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports
  4. Archives
  Submit Manuscript

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/CCSRR-CR-25-39

Collauralfistula: A Different Surgical Approach

Sathiyabama *, Rakshita Devi , Varun Segar

Department of Ophthalmology, India

*Corresponding Author: Sathiyabama, Department of Ophthalmology, India

Citation: Sathiyabama, Rakshita Devi, Varun Segar (2025) Collauralfistula: A Different Surgical Approach, J Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. 2(4) 39, DOI: CCSRR-CR-25-39

Copyright: Sathiyabama, et al © (2025). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 16 August 2025 | Accepted: 22 August 2025 | Published: 29 August 2025

Keywords: skin; pharynx

Abstract

Pharyngeal pouches develop around the fourth week of embryological development. Incomplete formation of pouches leads to developmental anomalies. 

As these are congenital anomalies, they are mostly asymptomatic and only noticed incidentally. Anomalies will present as a cyst, sinus or fistula. Cysts have an epithelial lining without external openings. Sinus tracts may communicate either externally with skin as a visible punctum or internally with the pharynx or larynx. Branchial cleft fistulae are true communications connecting the pharynx or larynx with the external skin.

References

  1. Branchial anomalies in children, Y Bajaj , S Ifeacho, D Tweedie, C G Jephson, D M Albert, L A Cochrane, M E Wyatt, N Jonas, B E J Hartley
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  2. Branchial Cleft Cyst, Anouchka H. Coste; Daniel H. Lofgren; Carl Shermetaro.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  3. Collaural Fistula on the Left-side of the Face: A Case Report, SAGAR GAURKAR, CHANDRAVEER SINGH, JASLEEN KAUR, PRASAD T Deshmukh
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  4. First branchial cleft anomalies in children: Experience with 30 cases WanpengLi , Liming Zhao,Hongming Xu , Xiaoyan Li
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  5. Clinical analysis of first branchial cleft anomalies in children, Wei Liu, Bing Liu, Min Chen ,Jinsheng Hao , Yang Yang , Jie Zhang.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  6. Updating concepts of first branchial cleft defects: a literature review, Alwyn R D'Souza, Harpreet S Uppal, Ranit De, Hisham Zeitoun
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  7. First Branchial Cleft Anomalies: Rare Work Type I and Type II Entities, Konstantinos Tarazis, MD, Konstantinos Garefis, MD, MSc and Konstantinos Markou, MD, PhD
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  8. Collaural fistula (Work Type II first branchial cleft anomaly) with prolonged morbidity: A case report Dorji Penjor, Morimasa Kitamura
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
img

Harry Brooks

journal of Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports. I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office.the reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding anu modifications for my manuscript,and the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help.it was my pleasure to contribute with your promising journal and i am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mark

My testimonial covering : the peer review process is qucick and effective,the support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly, quality of the Clinical Case Studies and Review Reports is scientific and publishers research.

img

Sinisa franjic

i would like to thank the editorial team for their timely responses and consideration in the publication of my paper . I would encourage to publish there research in ScienceFrontier.

img

Ritu Tiwari

I am pleased to submit my testimonials regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. As a peer reviewer for the manuscript titled “A Novel Dissolution Method for Simultaneous Estimation of sennoside A and Sennoside B in Senna Tablet,” I was consistently impressed by the reviewers’ thorough analysis, insightful feedback, and unwavering commitment to enhancing the quality of the work. Their reviews were comprehensive and characterized by a respectful and collaborative approach, providing valuable suggestions that significantly improved the paper's outcome. Their dedication to the peer review process demonstrated their expertise and steadfast pursuit of excellence.

img

Qader Bawerdi

With all due respect, I would like to express my opinion on the peer review, editorial support, and the quality of the journal as follows: The peer review was conducted quickly and with great care, and my article was accepted for publication in less than a week. The editorial support regarding the status of the article process was excellent, and they informed me every day until the acceptance of the current status of the article version, and regarding how to answer questions, the editorial support was excellent, timely, and friendly, and they answered questions as soon as possible and did not hesitate. The quality of the journal was excellent and it made me proud to be acquainted with the journal, and I sincerely look forward to extensive scientific collaborations in any field. I hope for increasing success and pride for the International Journal of Social Science Research and Review and all scientific and knowledge-based communities. Thank you

img

Bhuvanagiri Sathya Sindhuja

"I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the opportunity to contribute to this esteemed journal. The publication process was smooth, well-coordinated, and the peer reviewers deemed highly professional. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional diligence and support at every stage, ensuring a seamless experience from submission to final publication. I am truly honored to be featured in such a reputable platform and look forward to future collaborations."

img

Safana Abdullah Algutaini

Testimonial for the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements It was a truly rewarding experience publishing our study, "Single-Surgeon Outcomes of Left Ventricular Aneurysm Repair in Wartime Syria: A 10-Year Retrospective Study at Damascus University Cardiac Surgery Hospital," with the Journal of Biomedical Research and Clinical Advancements. The editorial and peer-review process was both rigorous and efficient, demonstrating a high standard of academic integrity and scientific scrutiny. The journal’s commitment to open access and global health equity is evident in its support of research emerging from conflict-affected and resource-limited settings—making our work not only visible but impactful. The professionalism of the editorial team, the speed of communication, and the clarity of submission guidelines all contributed to a smooth publication process. We were particularly impressed by the quality of the publication layout and the prompt indexing of our article, which enhances its accessibility to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers worldwide. We are proud to have contributed to this journal and highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a reputable platform to disseminate clinically significant and globally relevant findings.